User:Bukkia/sandboxVIII: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 175: Line 175:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
| style="width: 60px;"| || style="width: 130px;"| <center>''<small>indicative</small>''</center> || style="width: 130px;"| <center>''<small>subjuncitve</small>''</center> || style="width: 130px;"| <center>''<small>conditional</small>''</center>
| style="width: 60px;"| || style="width: 170px;"| <center>''<small>indicative</small>''</center> || style="width: 170px;"| <center>''<small>subjuncitve</small>''</center> || style="width: 170px;"| <center>''<small>conditional</small>''</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>imp. pres.</small>'' || <center>lī́lopī́to</center> || <center>lī́lopiñī́to</center> || <center>lī́lopɑtsī́to</center>
| ''<small>imp. pres.</small>'' || <center>śośirjyto</center> || <center>śośiriňyto</center> || <center>śośiročyto</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>imp. past</small>'' || <center>ʔalī́lopī́to</center> || <center>ʔalī́lopiñī́to</center> || <center>ʔalī́lopɑtsī́to</center>
| ''<small>imp. past</small>'' || <center>qaśośirjyto</center> || <center>qaśośiriňyto</center> || <center>qaśośiročyto</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>imp. pres.</small>'' || <center>lolī́pī́to</center> || <center>lolī́piñī́to</center> || <center>lolī́pɑtsī́to</center>
| ''<small>imp. pres.</small>'' || <center>śiśorjyto</center> || <center>śiśoriňyto</center> || <center>śiśoročyto</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>imp. past</small>'' || <center>ʔalolī́pī́to</center> || <center>ʔalolī́piñī́to</center> || <center>ʔalolī́pɑtsī́to</center>
| ''<small>imp. past</small>'' || <center>qaśiśorjyto</center> || <center>qaśiśoriňyto</center> || <center>qaśiśoročyto</center>
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 190: Line 190:


It is usually used to build relative clauses, in which the subject is the linked noun, and the direct object is declined in the ''ablative'' case:
It is usually used to build relative clauses, in which the subject is the linked noun, and the direct object is declined in the ''ablative'' case:
 
  qownaʂu qaloljyçočytoli hjyroli
  qownaʂu qaloljyçočytoli hjyroli
  <small>the man which might have seen the woman</small>
  <small>the man which might have seen the woman</small>
Line 199: Line 199:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
| style="width: 60px;"| || style="width: 130px;"| <center>''<small>indicative</small>''</center> || style="width: 130px;"| <center>''<small>subjuncitve</small>''</center> || style="width: 130px;"| <center>''<small>conditional</small>''</center>
| style="width: 60px;"| || style="width: 170px;"| <center>''<small>indicative</small>''</center> || style="width: 170px;"| <center>''<small>subjuncitve</small>''</center> || style="width: 170px;"| <center>''<small>conditional</small>''</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>imp. pres.</small>'' || <center>lī́lopuki</center> || <center>lī́lopiñuki</center> || <center>lī́lopɑtsuki</center>
| ''<small>imp. pres.</small>'' || <center>śośiruki</center> || <center>śośiriɳuki</center> || <center>śośiroçuki</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>imp. past</small>'' || <center>ʔalī́lopuki</center> || <center>ʔalī́lopiñuki</center> || <center>ʔalī́lopɑtsuki</center>
| ''<small>imp. past</small>'' || <center>qaśośiruki</center> || <center>qaśośiriɳuki</center> || <center>qaśośiroçuki</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>imp. pres.</small>'' || <center>lolī́puki</center> || <center>lolī́piñuki</center> || <center>lolī́pɑtsuki</center>
| ''<small>imp. pres.</small>'' || <center>śiśoruki</center> || <center>śiśoriɳuki</center> || <center>śiśoroçuki</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>imp. past</small>'' || <center>ʔalolī́puki</center> || <center>ʔalolī́piñuki</center> || <center>ʔalolī́pɑtsuki</center>
| ''<small>imp. past</small>'' || <center>qaśiśoruki</center> || <center>qaśiśoriɳuki</center> || <center>qaśiśoroçuki</center>
|-
|-
|}
|}
The passive participle is an adjectival form of a verb. It is used as a verbal adjective in sentences, and it can be declined. It is linked to nouns which undergo an action, or inactively are in a certain state.
The passive participle is an adjectival form of a verb. It is used as a verbal adjective in sentences, and it can be declined. It is linked to nouns which undergo an action, or inactively are in a certain state.


It is often used as an adjective and to build relative clauses:
It is often used as an adjective and to build relative clauses:
  xäl qownaʂu qaloljyçukili hjyroli
  xäl qownaʂu qaloljyçukili hjyroli
  <small>the man seen by the woman</small>
  <small>the man seen by the woman</small>
As an adjectival form, it displays a complete declension, to agree with the class of the referred noun.
As an adjectival form, it displays a complete declension, to agree with the class of the referred noun.



Revision as of 04:41, 26 August 2025

Verbs

The verbal system of Xowʂiko language is based on the fundamental dichotomy between imperfective aspect and perfective aspect. This distinction is conveyed by two different verbal roots for every verbal meaning, the imperfective root (Rimp) and the perfective root (Rprf). The perfective root is usually derived from the imperfective one through an introflexive process of vowel switching:

CV1CV2C → CV2CV1C

Example:

Rimp = wawok- → Rprf = wowak-

In addition to vowels, diphthongs can also be switched:

Rimp = hjeqak- → Rprf = haqjek-

Rising diphthongs -je- and -jy- can trigger the palatalization of some consonants. Thus, irregular root forms may often appear:

Rimp = žemon- → Rprf = ŕomjen-

In disyllabic verbal root, all vowels are involved in the switching process.

However, multisyllabic verbal roots can be formed through morphological derivation by adding prefixes or suffixes or both of them. These morphological affixes are usually not involved in the switching process. The vowel involved are those belonging to the original disyllabic root:

Rimp = wäqimjeŕ- → Rprf = wäqjemiŕ-
Rimp = ʈäwehowr- → Rprf = ʈewähowr-
Rimp = ŕäʈäwehek- → Rprf = ŕäʈewähek-

Monosyllabic roots, like qäɳ-, are usually not involved in the vowel switching process, being thus deemed as invariable roots without a perfective form (or without an imperfective form, in the very rare case when the base meaning is intrisically perfective). This rule may apply to some loanwords.

Another distinction is made, on a temporal level, between a non-past tense, generally called “present”, and a past tense, by means of the prefix qa-, known as augment, which conveys the past tense, while non-past actions are marked by its absence.

Rimp = wawok- → Rimp-past = qawawok-

There are three verbal moods and three non-finite forms:

  • Moods: indicative, subjunctive, conditional
  • Non-finite: infinitive, active participle, passive participle

The citation form of verbs is the present imperfective infinitive, marked by the ending -ika, added to the imperfective root in its present form. From such form the imperfective root can be inferred and can be changed in its perfective equivalent.

The following personal endings are then added to the various aspectual and temporal forms. In this way, verbs show their agreement with the clause subject in person and number:

1st sing.
-oh
2nd sing.
-er
3rd sing.
-
1st plur.
-onoh
2nd plur.
-oner
3rd plur.
-on

The different moods are formed by adding the following infixes to the verbal root, before the personal endings:

  • indicative: Ø
  • subjunctive: -iɳ-
  • conditional: -oç-

The non-finite verbal forms are meant as nominal/adjectival forms of the same verbs. They do not add the personal endings, but they are declined as nouns or adjectives with the nominal declension endings.

As verbal forms can, however, be formed on both roots and add the past prefix. They can also add the modal infixes before their typical endings.

The non-finite endings are:

  • infinitive: -ika
  • agentive participle: -jyto
  • passive participle: -uki

The infinitival form is meant as a 2nd class noun.

There is, moreover, a passive diathesis with an analytic-type construction, formed by the ver qäɳika, to be, as an auxiliary verb, and the passive participle. It conveys the same modal, aspectual and temporal forms as the active diathesis.

Conjugation of a regular verb

Example: śośirika, to take

Active diathesis

Indicative mood
imperfective
perfective
present
past
present
past
1st sing.
śośiroh
qaśośiroh
śiśoroh
qaśiśoroh
2nd sing.
śośirer
qaśośirer
śiśorer
qaśiśorer
3rd sing.
śośir
qaśośir
śiśor
qaśiśor
1st plur.
śośironoh
qaśośironoh
śiśoronoh
qaśiśoronoh
2nd plur.
śośironer
qaśośironer
śiśoroner
qaśiśoroner
3rd plur.
śośiron
qaśośiron
śiśoron
qaśiśoron

The indicative mood conveys mainly true and certain actions or state, or at least regarded as such. It is the most used verbal mood in main clauses.

Subjunctive mood

The subjunctive widely features the infix -iɳ-, which is placed between the roots and the personal endings.

imperfective
perfective
present
past
present
past
1st sing.
śośiriɳoh
qaśośiriɳoh
śiśoriɳoh
qaśiśoriɳoh
2nd sing.
śośiriɳer
qaśośiriɳer
śiśoriɳer
qaśiśoriɳer
3rd sing.
śośiriɳ
qaśośiriɳ
śiśoriɳ
qaśiśoriɳ
1st plur.
śośiriɳonoh
qaśośiriɳonoh
śiśoriɳonoh
qaśiśoriɳonoh
2nd plur.
śośiriɳoner
qaśośiriɳoner
śiśoriɳoner
qaśiśoriɳoner
3rd plur.
śośiriɳon
qaśośiriɳon
śiśoriɳon
qaśiśoriɳon

The subjunctive is mainly used as a dependent mood, with or without any subordinative conjunctions. In main clauses it may convey wish or exhortation, being thus used also as an imperative form.

Conditional mood

The conditional widely features the infix -oç-, which is placed between the roots and the personal endings.

imperfective
perfective
present
past
present
past
1st sing.
śośiroçoh
qaśośiroçoh
śiśoroçoh
qaśiśoroçoh
2nd sing.
śośiroçer
qaśośiroçer
śiśoroçer
qaśiśoroçer
3rd sing.
śośiroç
qaśośiroç
śiśoroç
qaśiśoroç
1st plur.
śośiroçonoh
qaśośiroçonoh
śiśoroçonoh
qaśiśoroçonoh
2nd plur.
śośiroçoner
qaśośiroçoner
śiśoroçoner
qaśiśoroçoner
3rd plur.
śośiroçon
qaśośiroçon
śiśoroçon
qaśiśoroçon

The conditional mood conveys mainly the intrinsic potentiality of an action or a state, both in main and in dependent clauses. It may also convey wish or hope.

For this reason the present tense usually refer to future actions, while the past tenses are used to refer to future actions in the past (the past perfective is routinely used as future in the past tense).

Non-finite forms

The non-finite verbal forms are:

Infinitive
indicative
subjuncitve
conditional
imp. pres.
śośirika
śośiriɳika
śośiroçika
imp. past
qaśośirika
qaśośiriɳika
qaśośiroçika
imp. pres.
śiśorika
śiśoriɳika
śiśoroçika
imp. past
qaśiśorika
qaśiśoriɳika
qaśiśoroçika

The infinitive is a nominal form of a verb. It is used as a verbal noun in sentences, and it can be declined. It is regarded as a 2nd class noun.

In its subjunctive form it is often used in dependent clauses in their infinitival type.

Direct objects of the infinitival forms are declined in the ablative case.

Active participle
indicative
subjuncitve
conditional
imp. pres.
śośirjyto
śośiriňyto
śośiročyto
imp. past
qaśośirjyto
qaśośiriňyto
qaśośiročyto
imp. pres.
śiśorjyto
śiśoriňyto
śiśoročyto
imp. past
qaśiśorjyto
qaśiśoriňyto
qaśiśoročyto

The active participle is an adjectival form of a verb. It is used as a verbal adjective in sentences, and it can be declined. It is linked to nouns which actively perform an action.

It is usually used to build relative clauses, in which the subject is the linked noun, and the direct object is declined in the ablative case:

qownaʂu qaloljyçočytoli hjyroli
the man which might have seen the woman

As an adjectival form, it displays a complete declension, to agree with the class of the referred noun.

Passive participle
indicative
subjuncitve
conditional
imp. pres.
śośiruki
śośiriɳuki
śośiroçuki
imp. past
qaśośiruki
qaśośiriɳuki
qaśośiroçuki
imp. pres.
śiśoruki
śiśoriɳuki
śiśoroçuki
imp. past
qaśiśoruki
qaśiśoriɳuki
qaśiśoroçuki

The passive participle is an adjectival form of a verb. It is used as a verbal adjective in sentences, and it can be declined. It is linked to nouns which undergo an action, or inactively are in a certain state.

It is often used as an adjective and to build relative clauses:

xäl qownaʂu qaloljyçukili hjyroli
the man seen by the woman

As an adjectival form, it displays a complete declension, to agree with the class of the referred noun.

Negation

The verbal negation is conveyed by the negative verb qjysika. As it has a monosyllabic root, it does not display a perfective root.

Within the sentence this verb is conjugated according to the person and the number of its subject and according to the required tense. It has the indicative infinitival form of the negated verb as direct object. The aspectual information is conveyed by the infinitival form. The object of the infinitive, is, as a rule, declined in the ablative case.

sopali hjyro qaňymac → sopali hjyroʂu ňymacika qaqjys
the dog bit the man → the dog didn’t bite the man
sopali ʎehon → sopali ʎehonika qjys
the dog is sleeping → the dog isn’t sleeping

Double negatives are generally not allowed; the presence of another negative element in the sentence inhibits the negative verb.