User:Bukkia/sandboxVIII: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
===Personal pronouns===
===Personal pronouns===
Personal pronouns display a marked dichotomy between the forms in the agentive case and the forms in the passive case. Both forms have two different roots, exhibiting thus a mixed declension; more than one form for each case is created on both roots.
Personal pronouns display a marked dichotomy between the first two persons (1<sup><small>st</small></sup> and 2<sup><small>nd</small></sup>) and the 3<sup><small>rd</small></sup> person.
 
Both the first and the second person have indeed two different roots, exhibiting thus a mixed declension; more than one form for each case are created on both roots. On the other hand, the third person has only one root.
 
{|-
{|-
|-
|-
| style="width: 100px;"| || style="width: 90px;"|<center><small>''1<sup>st</sup> sing.''</small></center> || style="width: 90px;"|<center><small>''2<sup>nd</sup> sing.''</small></center> || style="width: 90px;"|<center><small>''3<sup>rd</sup> sing.''</small></center> || style="width: 90px;"|<center><small>''1<sup>st</sup> dual.''</small></center> || style="width: 90px;"|<center><small>''2<sup>nd</sup> dual.''</small></center> || style="width: 90px;"|<center><small>''3<sup>rd</sup> dual.''</small></center> || style="width: 90px;"|<center><small>''1<sup>st</sup> plur.''</small></center> || style="width: 90px;"|<center><small>''2<sup>nd</sup> plur.''</small></center> || style="width: 90px;"|<center><small>''3<sup>rd</sup> plur.''</small></center>
| style="width: 100px;"| || style="width: 80px;"|<center><small>''1<sup>st</sup> sing.''</small></center> || style="width: 80px;"|<center><small>''2<sup>nd</sup> sing.''</small></center> || style="width: 80px;"|<center><small>''3<sup>rd</sup> sing.''</small></center> || style="width: 80px;"|<center><small>''1<sup>st</sup> plur.''</small></center> || style="width: 80px;"|<center><small>''2<sup>nd</sup> plur.''</small></center> || style="width: 80px;"|<center><small>''3<sup>rd</sup> plur.''</small></center>
|-
|-
| <center><small>''agentive''</small></center>  || ūdju || irdju || jɛšlu || ūdjuhiw || irdjuhiw || jɛšluhiw || ūdjunu || irdjunu || jɛšlunu
| <center><small>''ergative''</small></center>  || oltəw || ertəw || ət́lo || oltəwno || ertəwno || ət́lono
|-
|-
| <center><small>''passive''</small></center>  || çu || njɛ || jɛš || çuhiw || njɛhiw || jɛšhiw || çunu || njɛnu || jɛšnu
| <center><small>''absolutive''</small></center>  || jo || || ət́ || jono || nəno || ət́no
|-
|-
| rowspan="2" | <center><small>''ablative''</small></center> || ūdjušu || irdjušu || jɛšlušu || ūdjuhiwšu || irdjuhiwšu || jɛšluhiwšu || ūdjunušu || irdjunušu || jɛšlunušu
| <center><small>''genitive''</small></center> || jora || nəra || ət́ra || jorano || nərano || ət́rano
|-
|-
| çušu || njɛšu || jɛšu || çuhiwšu || njɛhiwšu || jɛšhiwšu || çunušu || njɛnušu || jɛšnušu
| <center><small>''dative''</small></center> || joxə || nəxə || ət́əxə || joxəno || nəxəno || ət́əxəno
|-
|-
| rowspan="2" | <center><small>''genitive''</small></center> || ūdjurɛ || irdjurɛ || jɛšlurɛ || ūdjuhiwrɛ || irdjuhiwrɛ || jɛšluhiwrɛ || ūdjunurɛ || irdjunurɛ || jɛšlunurɛ
| <center><small>''causative''</small></center> || joxəw || nəxəw || ət́əxəw || joxəwno || nəxəwno || ət́əxəwno
|-
|-
| çurɛ || njɛrɛ || jɛšrɛ || çuhiwrɛ || njɛhiwrɛ || jɛšhiwrɛ || çunurɛ || njɛnurɛ || jɛšnurɛ
| <center><small>''abessive''</small></center> || || || ət́əgiəl || || || ət́əgiəlno
|-
| rowspan="2" | <center><small>''dative''</small></center> || ūdjuxjɛ || irdjuxjɛ || jɛšluxjɛ || ūdjuhiwxjɛ || irdjuhiwxjɛ || jɛšluhiwxjɛ || ūdjunuxjɛ || irdjunuxjɛ || jɛšlunuxjɛ
|-
| çuxjɛ || njɛxjɛ || jɛšxjɛ || çuhiwxjɛ || njɛhiwxjɛ || jɛšhiwxjɛ || çunuxjɛ || njɛnuxjɛ || jɛšnuxjɛ
|-
| rowspan="2" | <center><small>''causative''</small></center> || ūdjuku || irdjuku || jɛšluku || ūdjuhiwku || irdjuhiwku || jɛšluhiwku || ūdjunuku || irdjunuku || jɛšlunuku
|-
| çuku || njɛku || jɛšku || çuhiwku || njɛhiwku || jɛšhiwku || çunuku || njɛnuku || jɛšnuku
|}
|}


No personal pronouns display any form for the obsolete instrumental case. First and second person forms are meant as referents for class I entities. Conversely, the third person forms display a complete declension, in which the case forms are used whether the referred name belongs to class I or class II.
First and second person forms are meant as referents for 1<sup>st</sup> class entities; the endings for the secondary oblique cases are thus not used with them. Conversely, the third person forms display a complete declension, in which the case forms are used whether the referred name belongs to the 1<sup>st</sup> or the 2<sup>nd</sup> class.


Personal pronouns have two forms in all cases, except for the agentive case and the passive case. These forms are distinguished between ''long forms'' (ūdjušu, irdjušu,...) and ''short forms'' (çušu, njɛšu,...), which have a different use:
In the pre-classical period another form for the third person, nigtu, is also used. This form is used in an obviative relationship with the form ɑktu, but it has already disappeared in the classical period.


* ''long forms'': used mostly alone (<small>without any adjoing preposition</small>), as proper case form of the pronoun
1<sup>st</sup> and 2<sup>nd</sup> person pronouns have two forms in the ablative and in the genitive case. These forms are distinguished between ''broad forms'' (owtušu, ertušu,...) and ''narrow forms'' (jošu, nɑšu,...), which have a different use:
* ''short forms'': used mostly with prepositions


In earlier texts, however, these usages are vague and confused.
*In the '''ablative''' case:
**''Broad form'': it is used as the ablative form of the pronoun, in the main meanings of the case and with postpositions. It is also used to mark belonging (according to the role of the ablative case), playing the role of an indeclinable possessive adjective or pronoun.
ertunošu papu ʔalolī́ponow
<small>we saw your father</small>


Usages of the genitive and ablative forms are more elaborated:
**''Narrow form'': it is mostly used as a direct object form for verbal infinitives and in negative sentences.
nɑšu hṓthī́niñɑme ʔaʔī́sow
<small>I wasn't looking for you</small>


*In the '''genitive''' case:
*In the '''genitive''' case:
**''Long form'': it is used to mark strictly possession, playing the role of an indeclinable possessive adjective or pronoun.
**''Broad form'': it is used to mark strictly possession, playing the role of an indeclinable possessive adjective or pronoun.
 
  ertunora sṓgo ʔalolī́ponow
  hɛlulīšunū irdjunurɛ sōgu
  <small>we saw your house</small>
  <small>we saw your house</small>


:*''Short form'': it is used as the proper genitive form of the pronoun, used either with or without prepositions.
**''Narrow form'': it is mostly used with postpositions.
 
  nɑra ʔḕ kogiwow
*In the '''ablative''' case:
  <small>I'm going to come with you</small>
**''Long form'': it is used as the ablative form of the pronoun, to be used alone, without prepositions. It is also used to mark belonging (according to the role of the ablative case), playing the role of an indeclinable possessive adjective or pronoun.
 
hɛlulīšunū irdjunušu bɛbju
<small>we saw your father</small>
 
:*''Short form'': it is mostly used with prepositions. Already in classical texts it is used as a direct object form in negative sentences.
  nɑšu hṓthī́niñɑme ʔaʔī́sow
  <small>I wasn't looking for you</small>


:In earlier texts, both ablative forms can be found as a direct object in negative sentences.
Especially in the genitive case these roles are not unchangeably fixed, but they can shift meaning during the entire history of the language: is it indeed not impossibile to find the narrow forms with a possessive role in the later period.

Revision as of 10:06, 4 July 2025

Personal pronouns

Personal pronouns display a marked dichotomy between the first two persons (1st and 2nd) and the 3rd person.

Both the first and the second person have indeed two different roots, exhibiting thus a mixed declension; more than one form for each case are created on both roots. On the other hand, the third person has only one root.

1st sing.
2nd sing.
3rd sing.
1st plur.
2nd plur.
3rd plur.
ergative
oltəw ertəw ət́lo oltəwno ertəwno ət́lono
absolutive
jo ət́ jono nəno ət́no
genitive
jora nəra ət́ra jorano nərano ət́rano
dative
joxə nəxə ət́əxə joxəno nəxəno ət́əxəno
causative
joxəw nəxəw ət́əxəw joxəwno nəxəwno ət́əxəwno
abessive
ət́əgiəl ət́əgiəlno

First and second person forms are meant as referents for 1st class entities; the endings for the secondary oblique cases are thus not used with them. Conversely, the third person forms display a complete declension, in which the case forms are used whether the referred name belongs to the 1st or the 2nd class.

In the pre-classical period another form for the third person, nigtu, is also used. This form is used in an obviative relationship with the form ɑktu, but it has already disappeared in the classical period.

1st and 2nd person pronouns have two forms in the ablative and in the genitive case. These forms are distinguished between broad forms (owtušu, ertušu,...) and narrow forms (jošu, nɑšu,...), which have a different use:

  • In the ablative case:
    • Broad form: it is used as the ablative form of the pronoun, in the main meanings of the case and with postpositions. It is also used to mark belonging (according to the role of the ablative case), playing the role of an indeclinable possessive adjective or pronoun.
ertunošu papu ʔalolī́ponow
we saw your father
    • Narrow form: it is mostly used as a direct object form for verbal infinitives and in negative sentences.
nɑšu hṓthī́niñɑme ʔaʔī́sow
I wasn't looking for you
  • In the genitive case:
    • Broad form: it is used to mark strictly possession, playing the role of an indeclinable possessive adjective or pronoun.
ertunora sṓgo ʔalolī́ponow
we saw your house
    • Narrow form: it is mostly used with postpositions.
nɑra ʔḕ kogiwow
I'm going to come with you

Especially in the genitive case these roles are not unchangeably fixed, but they can shift meaning during the entire history of the language: is it indeed not impossibile to find the narrow forms with a possessive role in the later period.