User:Bukkia/sandboxVIII: Difference between revisions
From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Negation=== | ===Negation=== | ||
There are two different way of negating a root, depending on whether the root is verbal or nominal. | |||
#The negation of a verbal root is conveyed by the negative verbal root '''ʔiːs-'''. As it is a monosyllabic root, it does not display a perfective counterpart. It has the ''infinitive<sub><small>1</small></sub>'' of the negated verb as direct object. The object of the infinitival form, is, as a rule, declined in the ''ablative'' case. | |||
'''ɬiːroli ʔoːna liːloṕ(æt́) → ɬiːroli ʔoːnaʂu liːloṕæme ʔiːs(æt́)''' | |||
<small>the | <small>the man sees the woman → the man does not see the woman</small> | ||
Within the sentence this verb is conjugated according to the person and the number of its subject and according to the required tense, through the augment. The aspectual information is conveyed by the infinitival form, as the negative root has no aspectual counterpart. | |||
<small>the | |||
'''ɬiːroli ʔoːna ʔaloliːṕ(æt́) → ɬiːroli ʔoːnaʂu loliːṕæme ʔaʔiːs(æt́)''' | |||
<small>the man saw the woman → the man did not see the woman</small> | |||
As can be seen, the negative verbs can use both the third person endings, according to the rules and the animacy degrees conveyed by the negated verb. | As can be seen, the negative verbs can use both the third person endings, according to the rules and the animacy degrees conveyed by the negated verb. | ||
''Double negatives'' are generally '''''not''' allowed''; the presence of another negative element in the sentence inhibits the negative verb. | ''Double negatives'' are generally '''''not''' allowed''; the presence of another negative element in the sentence inhibits the negative verb. | ||
Revision as of 01:46, 2 July 2025
Negation
There are two different way of negating a root, depending on whether the root is verbal or nominal.
- The negation of a verbal root is conveyed by the negative verbal root ʔiːs-. As it is a monosyllabic root, it does not display a perfective counterpart. It has the infinitive1 of the negated verb as direct object. The object of the infinitival form, is, as a rule, declined in the ablative case.
ɬiːroli ʔoːna liːloṕ(æt́) → ɬiːroli ʔoːnaʂu liːloṕæme ʔiːs(æt́) the man sees the woman → the man does not see the woman
Within the sentence this verb is conjugated according to the person and the number of its subject and according to the required tense, through the augment. The aspectual information is conveyed by the infinitival form, as the negative root has no aspectual counterpart.
ɬiːroli ʔoːna ʔaloliːṕ(æt́) → ɬiːroli ʔoːnaʂu loliːṕæme ʔaʔiːs(æt́) the man saw the woman → the man did not see the woman
As can be seen, the negative verbs can use both the third person endings, according to the rules and the animacy degrees conveyed by the negated verb.
Double negatives are generally not allowed; the presence of another negative element in the sentence inhibits the negative verb.