User:Bukkia/sandboxVIII: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Verbs==
==Verbs==
The verbal system of Cärähə language displays the following features:
The verbal system of Biwdiw language is based on the fundamental dichotomy between '''imperfective''' aspect and '''perfective''' aspect. This distinction is conveyed by two different verbal roots for every verbal meaning, the ''imperfective root'' ('''R<sub>imp</sub>''') and the ''perfective root'' ('''R<sub>prf</sub>'''). The perfective root is usually derived from the imperfective one through an introflexive process of vowel switching:
 
*'''tense''':
**''simple tenses'': present, past
**''compound tenses'': present continuous, past continuous, perfect, pluperfect, future, anterior future, future in the past
*'''mood''':
**''definite moods'': indicative, subjunctive, optative, potential
**''indefinite moods'': infinitive, active participle, passive participle
*'''diathesis''': active, passive
 
Each verb has two roots, the ''present root'' ('''R<sub>pres</sub>''') and the ''past root'' ('''R<sub>past</sub>'''). The base form is the present root, while the past root is usually derived fromt he present one. . The perfective root is usually derived from the imperfective one through an introflexive process of vowel switching:


  CV'''<sub>1</sub>'''CV'''<sub>2</sub>'''C → CV'''<sub>2</sub>'''CV'''<sub>1</sub>'''C
  CV'''<sub>1</sub>'''CV'''<sub>2</sub>'''C → CV'''<sub>2</sub>'''CV'''<sub>1</sub>'''C


Example:
Example:
  '''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = moɕäd- → '''R<sub>prf</sub>''' = mäɕod-
  '''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = gɛgug- → '''R<sub>prf</sub>''' = gugɛg-
 
In addition to vowels, the diphthongs -jɛ-, -ju- and -iw- can be switched:
'''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = čiwgul- → '''R<sub>prf</sub>''' = čugiwl-


This process may give rise to irregular root forms.
Rising diphthongs -jɛ- and -ju- can trigger the palatalization of some consonants. Thus, irregular root forms may often appear:


  '''R<sub>pres</sub>''' = ǵärug- → '''R<sub>past</sub>''' = guŕäg-
  '''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = cɛgil- → '''R<sub>prf</sub>''' = ʈigjɛl-


In disyllabic verbal root, all vowels are involved in the switching process.  
In disyllabic verbal root, all vowels are involved in the switching process.  
Line 25: Line 18:
However, multisyllabic verbal roots can be formed through morphological derivation by adding prefixes or suffixes or both of them. These morphological affixes are usually not involved in the switching process. The vowel involved are those belonging to the original disyllabic root:
However, multisyllabic verbal roots can be formed through morphological derivation by adding prefixes or suffixes or both of them. These morphological affixes are usually not involved in the switching process. The vowel involved are those belonging to the original disyllabic root:


  '''R<sub>pres</sub>''' = secerun- → '''R<sub>past</sub>''' = securen-
  '''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = hūgāsus- → '''R<sub>prf</sub>''' = hūgusās-
 
'''R<sub>pres</sub>''' = sühisuh- → '''R<sub>past</sub>''' = sihüsuh-
 
'''R<sub>pres</sub>''' = x́äsähirih- → '''R<sub>past</sub>''' = x́äsihärih-


Some verbs, many of them neologisms or loanwords, derive their past root from the present one by adding the suffix -ig, without any vowel switching:
'''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = ʂēhiwšōr- → '''R<sub>prf</sub>''' = ʂiwhēšōr-


  CV'''<sub>1</sub>'''CV'''<sub>2</sub>'''C CV'''<sub>1</sub>'''CV'''<sub>2</sub>'''C'''ig'''
  '''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = xjɛcɛgilig- → '''R<sub>prf</sub>''' = xjɛʈigjɛlig-


:Example:
Monosyllabic roots, like çɛň-, are usually not involved in the vowel switching process, being thus deemed as invariable roots without a perfective form (<small>or without an imperfective form, in the very rare case when the base meaning is intrisically perfective</small>). This rule may apply to some loanwords.
'''R<sub>pres</sub>''' = çurühuh- → '''R<sub>past</sub>''' = çurühuhig-


The verb cänühä, ''to be'', display a totally irregular past root:
Another distinction is made, on a temporal level, between a non-past tense, generally called “''present'', and a past tense, by means of the prefix hɛ-, known as ''augment'', which conveys the past tense, while non-past actions are marked by its absence.


  '''R<sub>pres</sub>''' = cän- → '''R<sub>past</sub>''' = häcän-
  '''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = gɛgug- → '''R<sub>imp-past</sub>''' = hɛgɛgug-


Likewise, other monosyllabic verbs are treated as irregular verbs.
There are also three analytic verbal forms, compound tenses with the auxiliary verb çɛňiwgɛ, ''to be'', and an infinitival form: an imperfective future, a perfect resultative and a plusquamperfect resultative.


The citation form of verbs is the present infinitive, marked by the ending -ühä. From such form the present verbal root can be inferred and can be changed in every other verbal form.
There are four verbal moods and three non-finite forms:
* ''Moods'': indicative, subjunctive, optative, potential
* ''Non-finite'': infinitive, agentive participle, passive participle


All verbs are divided in two classes, depending on the outcome of the third singular person. In the ''first class'' ('''class I'''), the ending -äh is used, with some possible irregularities, while in the ''second class'' ('''class II'''), a ''null ending'' is used, with a more regular outcome. Verbs with a past root built with the suffix -ig- belong always to the class II, creating thus a subgroup, known as '''class IIg'''.
The citation form of verbs is the present imperfective infinitive, marked by the ending -iwgɛ, added to the imperfective root in its present form. From such form the imperfective root can be inferred and can be changed in its perfective equivalent.


In simple tenses the following personal endings are added to the verbal root. In this way, verbs show their agreement with the clause subject in person and number:
The following personal endings are then added to the various aspectual and temporal forms. In this way, verbs show their agreement with the clause subject in person and number:


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
| style="width: 70px;"| || style="width: 70px;"| <center>''class I''</center> || style="width: 70px;"| <center>''class II''</center>
| style="width: 70px;"| ''<small>1<sup>st</sup> sing.</small>'' || style="width: 70px;"| <center>-ū</center>
|-
| ''<small>2<sup>nd</sup> sing.</small>'' || <center>-ir</center>
|-
| rowspan="2" | ''<small>3<sup>rd</sup> sing.</small>'' || <center>-jɛc / -<sup><small>j</small></sup>ɛc</center>
|-
| <center>-</center>
|-
| style="width: 70px;"| ''<small>1<sup>st</sup> dual</small>'' || style="width: 70px;"| <center>-iwhū</center>
|-
| ''<small>2<sup>nd</sup> dual</small>'' || <center>-iwhir</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>1<sup>st</sup> sing.</small>'' || <center>-ü</center> || <center>-ü</center>
| rowspan="2" | ''<small>3<sup>rd</sup> dual</small>'' || <center>-iwcɛc</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>2<sup>nd</sup> sing.</small>'' || <center>-ir</center> || <center>-ir</center>
| <center>-iwh</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>3<sup>rd</sup> sing.</small>'' || <center>-́äh</center> || <center>-</center>
| style="width: 70px;"| ''<small>1<sup>st</sup> plur.</small>'' || style="width: 70px;"| <center>-unū</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>1<sup>st</sup> plur.</small>'' || <center>-unü</center> || <center>-unü</center>
| ''<small>2<sup>nd</sup> plur.</small>'' || <center>-unir</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>2<sup>nd</sup> plur.</small>'' || <center>-unir</center> || <center>-unir</center>
| rowspan="2" | ''<small>3<sup>rd</sup> plur.</small>'' || <center>-unjɛc</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>3<sup>rd</sup> plur.</small>'' || <center>-uńäh</center> || <center>-un</center>
| <center>-un</center>
|}
|}
In the 3<small><sup>rd</sup></small> singular person, one of the endings displays two possible forms, -jɛc or -<sup><small>j</small></sup>ɛc. After some consonants this ending appears as -ɛc, and palatalizes the previous consonant, or it is added to an already palatalized consonant without further effects.
cɛgiliwgɛ → cɛgiʎɛc
<small>to say → he/she/it says</small>
lilušiwgɛ → lilušɛc
<small>to see → he/she/it sees</small>


The different moods are formed by adding the following infixes to the verbal root, before the personal endings:
The different moods are formed by adding the following infixes to the verbal root, before the personal endings:


*''indicative'': Ø
*''indicative'': Ø
*''subjunctive'': -ün-
*''subjunctive'': -iwň-
*''optative'': -us-
*''optative'': --
*''potential'': -äɕ-
*''potential'': -jɛʈ- / -<sup><small>j</small></sup>ɛʈ-
 
The potential mood infix displays the same irregularities as the 3<small><sup>rd</sup></small> singular person ending and it follows the same rules. All modal infixes merge with the 3<small><sup>rd</sup></small> singular person ending:
*-iwň- + -jɛc = -iwňɛc
*-uš- + -jɛc = -ušɛc
*-jɛʈ- + -jɛc = -jɛcɛc
 
The non-finite verbal forms are meant as nominal/adjectival forms of the same verbs. They do not add the personal endings, but they are declined as nouns or adjectives with the nominal declension endings.


The non-finite verbal forms are meant as nominal/adjectival forms of the same verbs. They do not add the personal endings, but they are declined as nouns or adjectives with the nominal declension endings. As verbal forms can, however, be formed on both roots.
As verbal forms can, however, be formed on both roots and add the past prefix. They can also add the modal infixes before their typical endings.


The non-finite endings are:
The non-finite endings are:
*''infinitive'': -ühä
*''infinitive'': -iwgɛ
*''active participle'': -īdə
*''agentive participle'': -īdu
*''passive participle'': -́uhi
*''passive participle'': -jugiw- / -<sup><small>j</small></sup>ugiw-
 
The passive participle ending displays the same irregularities as the 3<small><sup>rd</sup></small> singular person ending and it follows the same rules.


The passive particle ending may cause irregularities to arise in the roots.
The infinitival form is meant as a class II noun.

Revision as of 01:11, 10 June 2025

Verbs

The verbal system of Biwdiw language is based on the fundamental dichotomy between imperfective aspect and perfective aspect. This distinction is conveyed by two different verbal roots for every verbal meaning, the imperfective root (Rimp) and the perfective root (Rprf). The perfective root is usually derived from the imperfective one through an introflexive process of vowel switching:

CV1CV2C → CV2CV1C

Example:

Rimp = gɛgug- → Rprf = gugɛg-

In addition to vowels, the diphthongs -jɛ-, -ju- and -iw- can be switched:

Rimp = čiwgul- → Rprf = čugiwl-

Rising diphthongs -jɛ- and -ju- can trigger the palatalization of some consonants. Thus, irregular root forms may often appear:

Rimp = cɛgil- → Rprf = ʈigjɛl-

In disyllabic verbal root, all vowels are involved in the switching process.

However, multisyllabic verbal roots can be formed through morphological derivation by adding prefixes or suffixes or both of them. These morphological affixes are usually not involved in the switching process. The vowel involved are those belonging to the original disyllabic root:

Rimp = hūgāsus- → Rprf = hūgusās-
Rimp = ʂēhiwšōr- → Rprf = ʂiwhēšōr-
Rimp = xjɛcɛgilig- → Rprf = xjɛʈigjɛlig-

Monosyllabic roots, like çɛň-, are usually not involved in the vowel switching process, being thus deemed as invariable roots without a perfective form (or without an imperfective form, in the very rare case when the base meaning is intrisically perfective). This rule may apply to some loanwords.

Another distinction is made, on a temporal level, between a non-past tense, generally called “present”, and a past tense, by means of the prefix hɛ-, known as augment, which conveys the past tense, while non-past actions are marked by its absence.

Rimp = gɛgug- → Rimp-past = hɛgɛgug-

There are also three analytic verbal forms, compound tenses with the auxiliary verb çɛňiwgɛ, to be, and an infinitival form: an imperfective future, a perfect resultative and a plusquamperfect resultative.

There are four verbal moods and three non-finite forms:

  • Moods: indicative, subjunctive, optative, potential
  • Non-finite: infinitive, agentive participle, passive participle

The citation form of verbs is the present imperfective infinitive, marked by the ending -iwgɛ, added to the imperfective root in its present form. From such form the imperfective root can be inferred and can be changed in its perfective equivalent.

The following personal endings are then added to the various aspectual and temporal forms. In this way, verbs show their agreement with the clause subject in person and number:

1st sing.
2nd sing.
-ir
3rd sing.
-jɛc / -jɛc
-
1st dual
-iwhū
2nd dual
-iwhir
3rd dual
-iwcɛc
-iwh
1st plur.
-unū
2nd plur.
-unir
3rd plur.
-unjɛc
-un

In the 3rd singular person, one of the endings displays two possible forms, -jɛc or -jɛc. After some consonants this ending appears as -ɛc, and palatalizes the previous consonant, or it is added to an already palatalized consonant without further effects.

cɛgiliwgɛ → cɛgiʎɛc
to say → he/she/it says
lilušiwgɛ → lilušɛc
to see → he/she/it sees

The different moods are formed by adding the following infixes to the verbal root, before the personal endings:

  • indicative: Ø
  • subjunctive: -iwň-
  • optative: -uš-
  • potential: -jɛʈ- / -jɛʈ-

The potential mood infix displays the same irregularities as the 3rd singular person ending and it follows the same rules. All modal infixes merge with the 3rd singular person ending:

  • -iwň- + -jɛc = -iwňɛc
  • -uš- + -jɛc = -ušɛc
  • -jɛʈ- + -jɛc = -jɛcɛc

The non-finite verbal forms are meant as nominal/adjectival forms of the same verbs. They do not add the personal endings, but they are declined as nouns or adjectives with the nominal declension endings.

As verbal forms can, however, be formed on both roots and add the past prefix. They can also add the modal infixes before their typical endings.

The non-finite endings are:

  • infinitive: -iwgɛ
  • agentive participle: -īdu
  • passive participle: -jugiw- / -jugiw-

The passive participle ending displays the same irregularities as the 3rd singular person ending and it follows the same rules.

The infinitival form is meant as a class II noun.