User:Bukkia/sandboxVIII: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Verbs==
==Verbs==
The verbal system of Læntixu language displays the following features:
The verbal system of Biwdiw language is based on the fundamental dichotomy between '''imperfective''' aspect and '''perfective''' aspect. This distinction is conveyed by two different verbal roots for every verbal meaning, the ''imperfective root'' ('''R<sub>imp</sub>''') and the ''perfective root'' ('''R<sub>prf</sub>'''). The perfective root is usually derived from the imperfective one by means of the prefix hɛ-, known as ''augment'':


*'''tense''':
'''R<sub>imp</sub>''' → e'''(R<sub>imp</sub>)<sub>prf</sub>'''
**''simple tenses'': present
**''compound tenses'': present continuous, past, past continuous, pluperfect, future, anterior future
*'''mood''':
**''definite moods'': indicative, subjunctive, conditional
**''indefinite moods'': infinitive, active participle, passive participle
*'''diathesis''': active, passive


Only in the indicative mood verbs can express all tenses. In other moods only a part of the tenses are expressed.
Example:
'''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = gɛgug- → '''R<sub>prf</sub>''' = gugɛg-


The citation form of verbs is the present infinitive, marked by the ending -æm‘. From such form the present verbal root can be inferred and can be changed in every other verbal form.
In addition to vowels, the diphthongs -jɛ-, -ju- and -iw- can be switched:
'''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = čiwgul- → '''R<sub>prf</sub>''' = čugiwl-


Each verb has two roots, the ''present root'' ('''R<sub>pres</sub>''') and the ''past root'' ('''R<sub>past</sub>'''). The base form is the present root, while the past root is usually derived fromt he present one. Based on the different derivation processes, verbs are divided in two classes: '''strong verbs''' and '''weak verbs''':
Rising diphthongs -jɛ- and -ju- can trigger the palatalization of some consonants. Thus, irregular root forms may often appear:


* '''Strong verbs''', mostly with a '''CVCVC-''' structure, derive their past root from the present one through an introflexive process of vowel switching:
'''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = cɛgil- → '''R<sub>prf</sub>''' = ʈigjɛl-


CV'''<sub>1</sub>'''CV'''<sub>2</sub>'''C → CV'''<sub>2</sub>'''CV'''<sub>1</sub>'''C
In disyllabic verbal root, all vowels are involved in the switching process.


:Example:
However, multisyllabic verbal roots can be formed through morphological derivation by adding prefixes or suffixes or both of them. These morphological affixes are usually not involved in the switching process. The vowel involved are those belonging to the original disyllabic root:
'''R<sub>pres</sub>''' = toθir- → '''R<sub>past</sub>''' = tiθor-


:This process usually gives rise to irregular root forms.
'''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = hūgāsus- → '''R<sub>prf</sub>''' = hūgusās-


  '''R<sub>pres</sub>''' = ʎiloɸ- → '''R<sub>past</sub>''' = loʎiɸ-
  '''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = ʂēhiwšōr- → '''R<sub>prf</sub>''' = ʂiwhēšōr-


:In disyllabic verbal root, all vowels are involved in the switching process.
'''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = xjɛcɛgilig- → '''R<sub>prf</sub>''' = xjɛʈigjɛlig-


:However, multisyllabic verbal roots can be formed through morphological derivation by adding prefixes or suffixes or both of them. These morphological affixes are usually not involved in the switching process. The vowel involved are those belonging to the original disyllabic root:
Monosyllabic roots, like çɛň-, are usually not involved in the vowel switching process, being thus deemed as invariable roots without a perfective form (<small>or without an imperfective form, in the very rare case when the base meaning is intrisically perfective</small>). This rule may apply to some loanwords.


'''R<sub>pres</sub>''' = roʎiloɸ- → '''R<sub>past</sub>''' = roloʎiɸ-
Another distinction is made, on a temporal level, between a non-past tense, generally called “''present''”, and a past tense, by means of the prefix hɛ-, known as ''augment'', which conveys the past tense, while non-past actions are marked by its absence.


  '''R<sub>pres</sub>''' = menosɛx- → '''R<sub>past</sub>''' = monesɛx-
  '''R<sub>imp</sub>''' = gɛgug- → '''R<sub>imp-past</sub>''' = hɛgɛgug-


'''R<sub>pres</sub>''' = hæcæžɛbowr- → '''R<sub>past</sub>''' = hæcɛgæbowr-
There are also three analytic verbal forms, compound tenses with the auxiliary verb çɛňiwgɛ, ''to be'', and an infinitival form: an imperfective future, a perfect resultative and a plusquamperfect resultative.


* '''Weak verbs''', displaying any possible syllabic structure, derive their past root from the present one by adding the suffix -ix:
There are four verbal moods and three non-finite forms:
* ''Moods'': indicative, subjunctive, optative, potential
* ''Non-finite'': infinitive, agentive participle, passive participle


CV'''<sub>1</sub>'''CV'''<sub>2</sub>'''C → CV'''<sub>1</sub>'''CV'''<sub>2</sub>'''C'''ix'''
The citation form of verbs is the present imperfective infinitive, marked by the ending -iwgɛ, added to the imperfective root in its present form. From such form the imperfective root can be inferred and can be changed in its perfective equivalent.


:Example:
The following personal endings are then added to the various aspectual and temporal forms. In this way, verbs show their agreement with the clause subject in person and number:
'''R<sub>pres</sub>''' = ulixox- → '''R<sub>past</sub>''' = ulixoxix-
 
:This process usually does not give rise to irregular root forms.
 
* Monosyllabic verbal roots are usually regarded as weak verbs. There are, however, an extremely few monosyllabic strong verbs, which lack a distinct past root.
 
In simple tenses the following personal endings are added to the verbal root. In this way, verbs show their agreement with the clause subject in person and number:


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
| style="width: 70px;"| ''<small>1<sup>st</sup> sing.</small>'' || style="width: 70px;"| <center>-of</center>
| style="width: 70px;"| ''<small>1<sup>st</sup> sing.</small>'' || style="width: 70px;"| <center>-ū</center>
|-
| ''<small>2<sup>nd</sup> sing.</small>'' || <center>-ir</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>2<sup>nd</sup> sing.</small>'' || rowspan="2" | <center>-æh</center>
| rowspan="2" | ''<small>3<sup>rd</sup> sing.</small>'' || <center>-jɛc / -<sup><small>j</small></sup>ɛc</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>3<sup>rd</sup> sing.</small>''
| <center>-</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>1<sup>st</sup> plur.</small>'' || <center>-onof</center>
| style="width: 70px;"| ''<small>1<sup>st</sup> dual</small>'' || style="width: 70px;"| <center>-iwhū</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>2<sup>nd</sup> plur.</small>'' || rowspan="2" | <center>-onæh</center>
| ''<small>2<sup>nd</sup> dual</small>'' || <center>-iwhir</center>
|-
|-
| ''<small>3<sup>rd</sup> plur.</small>''
| rowspan="2" | ''<small>3<sup>rd</sup> dual</small>'' || <center>-iwcɛc</center>
|-
| <center>-iwh</center>
|-
| style="width: 70px;"| ''<small>1<sup>st</sup> plur.</small>'' || style="width: 70px;"| <center>-unū</center>
|-
| ''<small>2<sup>nd</sup> plur.</small>'' || <center>-unir</center>
|-
| rowspan="2" | ''<small>3<sup>rd</sup> plur.</small>'' || <center>-unjɛc</center>
|-
| <center>-un</center>
|}
|}


The second and the third person share the same ending in both numbers. Thus the subject pronouns is usually expressed in the second person, to avoid ambiguity. The third person pronoun is, conversely, usually not expressed and left implied:
In the 3<small><sup>rd</sup></small> singular person, one of the endings displays two possible forms, -jɛc or -<sup><small>j</small></sup>ɛc. After some consonants this ending appears as -ɛc, and palatalizes the previous consonant, or it is added to an already palatalized consonant without further effects.


  æpjixu kinusæh
  cɛgiliwgɛ → cɛgiʎɛc
  <small>you sing</small>
  <small>to say → he/she/it says</small>


  (æstu) kinusæh
  lilušiwgɛ → lilušɛc
  <small>he/she sings</small>
  <small>to see → he/she/it sees</small>


Compound tenses are usually formed through an auxiliary verb (ojæm‘, ''to be'', gjixæm‘, ''to want'', or jimæm‘, ''to go'') with the forms of the participles or the infinitive. The different moods are formed by adding the following infixes to the verbal root, before the personal endings:
The different moods are formed by adding the following infixes to the verbal root, before the personal endings:


*''indicative'': Ø
*''indicative'': Ø
*''subjunctive'': --
*''subjunctive'': -iwň-
*''conditional'': -æc-
*''optative'': --
*''potential'': -jɛʈ- / -<sup><small>j</small></sup>ɛʈ-
 
The potential mood infix displays the same irregularities as the 3<small><sup>rd</sup></small> singular person ending and it follows the same rules. All modal infixes merge with the 3<small><sup>rd</sup></small> singular person ending:
*-iwň- + -jɛc = -iwňɛc
*-uš- + -jɛc = -ušɛc
*-jɛʈ- + -jɛc = -jɛcɛc


The non-finite verbal forms are meant as nominal/adjectival forms of the same verbs. They do not add the personal endings, but they are declined as nouns or adjectives with the nominal declension endings.
The non-finite verbal forms are meant as nominal/adjectival forms of the same verbs. They do not add the personal endings, but they are declined as nouns or adjectives with the nominal declension endings.


As verbal forms can, however, be formed on both roots. The infinitive can also add the modal infixes before its typical ending.
As verbal forms can, however, be formed on both roots and add the past prefix. They can also add the modal infixes before their typical endings.


The non-finite endings are:
The non-finite endings are:
*''infinitive'': -æm‘
*''infinitive'': -iwgɛ
*''active participle'': -jiθu
*''agentive participle'': -īdu
*''passive participle'': -ux‘
*''passive participle'': -jugiw- / -<sup><small>j</small></sup>ugiw-
 
The passive participle ending displays the same irregularities as the 3<small><sup>rd</sup></small> singular person ending and it follows the same rules.


All the endings may merge with some verbal roots and create irregular forms.
The infinitival form is meant as a class II noun.

Revision as of 09:45, 9 June 2025

Verbs

The verbal system of Biwdiw language is based on the fundamental dichotomy between imperfective aspect and perfective aspect. This distinction is conveyed by two different verbal roots for every verbal meaning, the imperfective root (Rimp) and the perfective root (Rprf). The perfective root is usually derived from the imperfective one by means of the prefix hɛ-, known as augment:

Rimp → e(Rimp)prf

Example:

Rimp = gɛgug- → Rprf = gugɛg-

In addition to vowels, the diphthongs -jɛ-, -ju- and -iw- can be switched:

Rimp = čiwgul- → Rprf = čugiwl-

Rising diphthongs -jɛ- and -ju- can trigger the palatalization of some consonants. Thus, irregular root forms may often appear:

Rimp = cɛgil- → Rprf = ʈigjɛl-

In disyllabic verbal root, all vowels are involved in the switching process.

However, multisyllabic verbal roots can be formed through morphological derivation by adding prefixes or suffixes or both of them. These morphological affixes are usually not involved in the switching process. The vowel involved are those belonging to the original disyllabic root:

Rimp = hūgāsus- → Rprf = hūgusās-
Rimp = ʂēhiwšōr- → Rprf = ʂiwhēšōr-
Rimp = xjɛcɛgilig- → Rprf = xjɛʈigjɛlig-

Monosyllabic roots, like çɛň-, are usually not involved in the vowel switching process, being thus deemed as invariable roots without a perfective form (or without an imperfective form, in the very rare case when the base meaning is intrisically perfective). This rule may apply to some loanwords.

Another distinction is made, on a temporal level, between a non-past tense, generally called “present”, and a past tense, by means of the prefix hɛ-, known as augment, which conveys the past tense, while non-past actions are marked by its absence.

Rimp = gɛgug- → Rimp-past = hɛgɛgug-

There are also three analytic verbal forms, compound tenses with the auxiliary verb çɛňiwgɛ, to be, and an infinitival form: an imperfective future, a perfect resultative and a plusquamperfect resultative.

There are four verbal moods and three non-finite forms:

  • Moods: indicative, subjunctive, optative, potential
  • Non-finite: infinitive, agentive participle, passive participle

The citation form of verbs is the present imperfective infinitive, marked by the ending -iwgɛ, added to the imperfective root in its present form. From such form the imperfective root can be inferred and can be changed in its perfective equivalent.

The following personal endings are then added to the various aspectual and temporal forms. In this way, verbs show their agreement with the clause subject in person and number:

1st sing.
2nd sing.
-ir
3rd sing.
-jɛc / -jɛc
-
1st dual
-iwhū
2nd dual
-iwhir
3rd dual
-iwcɛc
-iwh
1st plur.
-unū
2nd plur.
-unir
3rd plur.
-unjɛc
-un

In the 3rd singular person, one of the endings displays two possible forms, -jɛc or -jɛc. After some consonants this ending appears as -ɛc, and palatalizes the previous consonant, or it is added to an already palatalized consonant without further effects.

cɛgiliwgɛ → cɛgiʎɛc
to say → he/she/it says
lilušiwgɛ → lilušɛc
to see → he/she/it sees

The different moods are formed by adding the following infixes to the verbal root, before the personal endings:

  • indicative: Ø
  • subjunctive: -iwň-
  • optative: -uš-
  • potential: -jɛʈ- / -jɛʈ-

The potential mood infix displays the same irregularities as the 3rd singular person ending and it follows the same rules. All modal infixes merge with the 3rd singular person ending:

  • -iwň- + -jɛc = -iwňɛc
  • -uš- + -jɛc = -ušɛc
  • -jɛʈ- + -jɛc = -jɛcɛc

The non-finite verbal forms are meant as nominal/adjectival forms of the same verbs. They do not add the personal endings, but they are declined as nouns or adjectives with the nominal declension endings.

As verbal forms can, however, be formed on both roots and add the past prefix. They can also add the modal infixes before their typical endings.

The non-finite endings are:

  • infinitive: -iwgɛ
  • agentive participle: -īdu
  • passive participle: -jugiw- / -jugiw-

The passive participle ending displays the same irregularities as the 3rd singular person ending and it follows the same rules.

The infinitival form is meant as a class II noun.