User:Bukkia/sandboxVIII: Difference between revisions
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===Personal pronouns=== | ===Personal pronouns=== | ||
Personal pronouns convey only the first two persons (1<sup><small>st</small></sup> and 2<sup><small>nd</small></sup>) without any distinction in number. | Personal pronouns convey only the first two persons (1<sup><small>st</small></sup> and 2<sup><small>nd</small></sup>) without any distinction in number. | ||
Both the first and the second person have indeed two different roots, exhibiting thus a mixed declension; the first forms convey the agentive case, and the second forms convey the passive case, the only cases originally conveyed by the personal pronoun. | |||
{|- | {|- | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
|} | |} | ||
These form are used in a very earlier period, when the basic word order is still VSO. Later they show a marked tendency to cliticization to the verbal form. Thus, new agentive forms for the personal pronouns arise, by expanding the original roots with the morpheme '''-tu'''. The passive forms are usually not expanded, likely because they already have a '''CV''' syllabic structure. | |||
{|- | {|- | ||
Revision as of 02:20, 11 July 2025
Pronouns
In the archaic period, pronouns are regarded as grammatical root, without an actual semantic meaning and only as grammatical referents. Their structure is thus usually (C)V(C). However, in a later pre-diasporic period, most pronominal roots are expanded to a disyllabic noun-type root, usually through the morphemes -tu and -lo.
Personal pronouns
Personal pronouns convey only the first two persons (1st and 2nd) without any distinction in number.
Both the first and the second person have indeed two different roots, exhibiting thus a mixed declension; the first forms convey the agentive case, and the second forms convey the passive case, the only cases originally conveyed by the personal pronoun.
These form are used in a very earlier period, when the basic word order is still VSO. Later they show a marked tendency to cliticization to the verbal form. Thus, new agentive forms for the personal pronouns arise, by expanding the original roots with the morpheme -tu. The passive forms are usually not expanded, likely because they already have a CV syllabic structure.
Sulla base di queste radici vengono in seguito formati gli altri casi. Non esiste accordo su quale radice eteroclita scegliere per aggiungere i morfemi di caso, perciò, si ritiene che rimanga sostanzialmente libera durante tutto il periodo unitario. In quanto intrinsecamente riferenti ad enti animati e attivi, le radici pronominali personali non prendono i morfemi dei casi obliqui secondari.
jora |
næra | |
joʂu |
næʂu | |
joχæ |
næχæ | |
jokʰu |
nækʰu | |
Come per i nomi, i morfemi di numero del plurale -no e del duale -ʔi non hanno una posizione fissa, andandosi a posizionare liberamente prima o dopo del morfema di caso. Declinazione del plurale:
jonora |
jorano |
nænora |
nærano | |
jonoʂu |
joʂuno |
nænoʂu |
næʂuno | |
jonoχæ |
joχæno |
nænoχæ |
næχæno | |
jonokʰu |
jokʰuno |
nænokʰu |
nækʰuno | |
joʔira |
joraʔi |
næʔira |
næraʔi | |
joʔiʂu |
joʂuʔi |
næʔiʂu |
næʂuʔi | |
joʔiχæ |
joχæʔi |
næʔiχæ |
næχæʔi | |
joʔikʰu |
jokʰuʔi |
næʔikʰu |
nækʰuʔi | |
Le forme di genitivo e di ablativo ricoprono, secondo il loro significato, il ruolo degli aggettivi e dei pronomi possessivi.