User:Bukkia/sandboxVIII: Difference between revisions
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* '''VSO''' (''Verb-Subject-Object''), which marks interrogative clauses, namely simple ''questions''. | * '''VSO''' (''Verb-Subject-Object''), which marks interrogative clauses, namely simple ''questions''. | ||
līlušɛc wīruliw subɛ | |||
<small>does the man see the dog?</small> | <small>does the man see the dog?</small> | ||
Revision as of 03:10, 11 April 2025
- Main article: Biwdiw
This page gives an extensive description of Biwdiw syntactical features.
Main clause and word order
Biwdiw is a mainly SVO (Subject-Verb-Object) language, but there are clear traces hinting to a previous underlying SOV (Subject-Object-Verb) order.
wīruliw līlušɛc subɛ the man sees the dog
The quite rich case system allows every other possible word order, but most of them prove to be very marked and infrequently used. SVO order is essentially used in the main clause. Other orders with a clear role and a frequent usage in the main clause are:
- VSO (Verb-Subject-Object), which marks interrogative clauses, namely simple questions.
līlušɛc wīruliw subɛ does the man see the dog?
- OSV (Object-Subject-Verb), which marks the so-called passive construct.
subɛ līluš wīruliw the dog is seen by the man
- VOS (Verb-Object-Subject), which marks the passive construct in a interrogative clause.
līluš subɛ wīruliw is the dog seen by the man?
The other elements in the sentence are usually placed in the order “place-manner-cause-time”, although they are basically freer than the main elements. An object in the dative case, when conveying the indirect object, tends to be placed before the direct object of the sentence.
A peculiar feature is the verbal infinitival agreement: when infinitival forms, as nominal forms of the verbs, take a direct object, are regarded as an expression of belonging, and the direct object is declined in the ablative case.
hīsū subɛšu līlušiwgɛ I do not see the dog.