User:Bukkia/sandboxVIII: Difference between revisions

From FrathWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{main|Læntixu}}
{{main|Modern Figo}}
This page gives an extensive description of '''Læntixu syntactical''' features.
This page gives an extensive description of '''modern Figo syntactical''' features.
==Main clause and word order==
==Main clause and word order==
Læntixu is an almost strictly '''SVO''' (''Subject-Verb-Object'') language.  
Modern Figo is an almost strictly '''SOV''' (''Subject-Object-Verb'') language.  
   
   
  æl‘ vjirul‘ ojh ʎiloɸjiθu æl‘ soɸal‘
  līruli soba līločeš
  <small>the man sees the dog</small>
  <small>the man sees the dog</small>


Despite the limited case system, the word order is essentially fixed because of the lacking distinction between the subject and the direct object.
The quite rich case system allows every other possible word order, but most of them prove to be very marked and infrequently used. The only word order with a clear role and a frequent usage is '''OSV''' (''Object-Subject-Verbs''), which marks the so-called ''passive construction''.


The other elements in the sentence are usually placed in the order “''time-cause-manner-place''”, although they are basically freer than the main elements, as they are conveyed by the case system or by the prepositions. These elements can be emphasized by placing them at the beginning of the sentence.
soba līruli līločeš
<small>the dog is seen by the man</small>


The indirect object tends to be placed ''after'' the direct object of the sentence. However, if both direct and indirect objects are used in pronominal form, they are placed right before the conjugated verbal form in reverse order.
The other elements in the sentence are usually placed in the order “''place-manner-cause-time''”, although they are basically freer than the main elements. An object in the dative case, when conveying the indirect object, tends to be placed ''before'' the direct object of the sentence.
 
A peculiar feature is the verbal ''infinitival agreement'': when infinitival forms, as nominal forms of the verbs, take a direct object, are regarded as an expression of belonging, and the direct object is declined in the ''genitive'' case.
 
sobaɕu līločem īsow
<small>I do not see the dog.</small>
 
The frequency of this feature, however, is already declining in the classical period, when the infinitival forms are used in a verbal costruction (as, for example, with modal verbs). The infinitival agreement is still widely used up to the later classical period when these forms are used in a nominal construction.
 
Moreover, as it can been seen in the example above, when an infinitival form is governed by a modal verb or by the negative verb īsem, the infinitive is always placed before the conjugated modal form.

Revision as of 10:07, 9 April 2025

Main article: Modern Figo

This page gives an extensive description of modern Figo syntactical features.

Main clause and word order

Modern Figo is an almost strictly SOV (Subject-Object-Verb) language.

līruli soba līločeš 
the man sees the dog

The quite rich case system allows every other possible word order, but most of them prove to be very marked and infrequently used. The only word order with a clear role and a frequent usage is OSV (Object-Subject-Verbs), which marks the so-called passive construction.

soba līruli līločeš
the dog is seen by the man

The other elements in the sentence are usually placed in the order “place-manner-cause-time”, although they are basically freer than the main elements. An object in the dative case, when conveying the indirect object, tends to be placed before the direct object of the sentence.

A peculiar feature is the verbal infinitival agreement: when infinitival forms, as nominal forms of the verbs, take a direct object, are regarded as an expression of belonging, and the direct object is declined in the genitive case.

sobaɕu līločem īsow
I do not see the dog.

The frequency of this feature, however, is already declining in the classical period, when the infinitival forms are used in a verbal costruction (as, for example, with modal verbs). The infinitival agreement is still widely used up to the later classical period when these forms are used in a nominal construction.

Moreover, as it can been seen in the example above, when an infinitival form is governed by a modal verb or by the negative verb īsem, the infinitive is always placed before the conjugated modal form.