LIMBAWA ... Chapter 2
R-form of the verb
Above we have discussed the R-form of the verb.
However there are other verb forms.
S-form of the verb
This is the subjunctive form. You change the "r" to an "s" basically. Nothing comes after the "s". So there is no tense/aspect or evidentiality expressed on this verb form.
doikais = Let's walk
ME-form of the verb
This form is used when one action is dependant on another action having taken place.
As with the s-form, there is no gwomai or evidentiality expressed on the verb.
MI-form of the verb
The same as the me-form but irrealis. With the me-form there is doubt as to when (and indeed if) the thunder/lightning will happen.
With the mi-form it is accepted that there is no chance of thunder/lightning ... the storm has passed.
YA-form of the verb
This form is used for giving orders. When the s-form is used in a main clause, it is gently urging some action. With the ya-form you definitely want some action to happen (and you don't expect a discussion about it).
Up until now, 7 protagonists have been expressed in every verb. With the ya-form however only two protagonists can be expressed.
doikiya = walk (when talking to one person)
doikeya = walk (when talking to more than one person)
An alternative way to analyse this is to say that there is an iya-form and an eya-form. How you choose to analyse it doesn't make any difference to the reality of the situation.
AI-form of the verb
The ai-form comprises three functions. In the LIMBAWA linguistic tradition, these are called "noun-ai", "verb-ai" and "small-verb-ai".
Noun-"ai"
nagu = strong obligation
glopu = weak obligation
olda = ability
henti = permission
nagai dara an = I must do something
nagai dari an = I had to do something
glopai dirti an = You ought to have done sometime
glopai doru an = He ought to do something
glopai dora an = She ought to be doing something ???
Verb-"ai"
singai laughai loʔura namboʔe => They go home singing and laughing
loʔura namboʔe singai laughai => They go home singing and laughing
This is used when things happen at the same time and the subject of all the verbs is the same. Notice that the ai-forms can come before or after the r-form verb.
This form can not be used when consecutive actions are being described.
Small-verb-"ai"
The small verbs constitute a subset of verbs. They always follow the r-form verbs.
It is very common to have the following verbs in their ai-form.
= to be at (bia) ... this can be interpreted in English as "still" ... or as "not yet" in negative sentences.
= to come
= to go
= to rise
= to descend
= to enter
= to go out
= to follow
= to cross
= to go through
= to pass
= to return
= to do something in a haphazard manner, to do something in an unsatisfactory manner
= to scatter about
= to hurry
The above are often stuck on the end of an utterance ... like a sort of afterthought. They give the utterance a bit more clarity ... a bit more resolution.
See what Dixon has in Dyirbal.
ai-form only with r-form or can also go with s-form, etc. etc.
You can add as many verbs as you want. The added verbs are understood to have the same protagonists, gwomai and evidentiality as the r-form verb.
passorla singai kite flyai = He is passing by singing and flying a kite
WHAT ABOUT SEPERATE OBJECTS ON THE TWO VERBS ?
WHEN WE INTRODUCE "ALONG" (FOR EXAMPLE) WE ARE INTRODUCING A NEW OBJECT IN THE CLAUSE ???
BIA ......... a copula of location
bià means "to be at"
For example polo bori london = Paul was in London
polo borta london = Paul has been to London
auto bora lence = The car is in the street.
pele boru nambo = Paula will be at home
bià is the rarest of the copulas and has no irregular forms.
It is often supplanted by sàu ... but if this happens a locative particle must be suffixed to the noun (the noun after the copula). For example ;-
polo rì london.pi = Paul was in London
auto (rà) lence.la = The car was in the street (literally "on the street")
pele ù rù namboʔe = Paula will not be at home
The three verbs sàu, gaza and bià are special verbs. (LINGUISTIC JARGON ... They are called copulas... in Latin "copulare" meant "to tie", so a copula is a verb that ties. The appropriateness of this is obvious for sau and bia) In Limbawa they differ from normal verbs, in that they require a specific word order. Also s (the ergative case) is never suffixed to a noun, as normally happens when a verb is associated with two nouns.
GAZA .... a copula of existence
gaza takes only one noun. It is how you say "there is ... "
gaza is similar to sàu in that it takes the 12 verb modifiers but 3 of them are wildly irregular. It is the same 3 tense/aspect forms that are irregular. Namely ;-
*gazora => ʕá meaning "there is"
*gazori => ʕái meaning "there was"
*gazoru => ʔáu meaning "there will be"
Actually while theoretically gaza can have the full range of modifiers enjoyed by a normal verb, in reality all forms other than ʕá, ʕái, ʔáu are extremely rare. Occasionally you come across the "infinitive" gaza (which is actually used as a noun).
There is no word that corresponds to "have". The usual way to say "I have a coat" is "there exists a coat mine" = ʕá kaunu pan
For some reason the internal possessives are not allowed with gaza. That is you can not say ʔá kaunapu, but must say ʔá kaunu pan
As I said above, gaza always comes with one noun. If it comes with an adjective, then that adjective can be considered a noun (well this is one way to look at it)
pona = cold (an adjective), ponama = coldness (a noun)
pona = "it is cold" ... not *ʔá ponama
ʔá pona pan meaning "I feel cold" (word for word ... "there is coldness mine")
There is fixed word order : it is always gaza followed by the noun.
A little quirk of this verb, is that the negation particle mo comes immediately after instead of immediately before.
ʔá mo pona = "it is not cold"
The particles lói (probably) and màs (maybe) come as normal, before the verb.
lói ʔáu pona = It will probably be cold
Also the evidentials are affixed to the wild forms. Just as with sàu.
lói ʔáun mò pona = They say it will probably not be cold
loi.foi ʔáun mò pona = Do they say it will probably not be cold ?
SAU ....... the main copula
sàu is the LIMBAWA copula. That is it is the equivalent of "to be" in English, whish has such forms as "be", "is", "was", "were" and "are".
This verb is slightly irregular in LIMBAWA as well. The three forms *sari, *saru and *sara which you would expect to see, are replaced with rì, rù and rà
Notice that person and number is not included in these three irregular forms, so it is sometimes necessary to have a pronoun in situations where it would normally be dropped.
Actually rà is usually missed out completely.
It is mostly used for emphasis; like when you are refuting a claim
Person A) ... gì mò rà moltai = You aren't a doctor
Person b) ... pà rà moltai = I am a doctor
Notice that rà is always used when you have mò the negative particle. This particle must always be directly in front of a verb, so rà must be expressed.
Another situation where rà tends to be used is when the subject or the copula complement are long trains of words. For example ????????
The evidentials are appended to the wild forms as normal. So we have ràn, ràs, rìn, rià, rìs, rùn, rùs,
..... Three infixes for Verb => Verb
Limbawa has a three process for generating new verbs from existing verbs. These three processes can be done to any verb.
.... -el-
If you split a verb and insert el between the final vowel (of the gamba) and the rest of the word, you give the added meaning of "to begin", "inception" or "to start off". For example ;-
sàu = to be
selau = to become
bìa = to be at
belia = to arrive at
doika = to walk
doikela = to start to walk
logo doikorwi = Roger used to walk ...
logo doikelorwi = Roger used to start walking ...
gazelari = I was born
à rì kiʔo = it was yellow ... remember that rì is an irregular form. The regular form would be *sori.
à lori kiʔo = it became yellow ... selau is irregular. If it were regular we would have the form *à selori ki@o
So there are thee irregular verbs in Limbawa (well if you count selau as a different word from sau) ... sàu, bìa and selau.
.... -ow-
If you split a verb and insert ow between the final vowel of and the rest of the word, you get the meaning that you are making somebody else do the verb. For example ;-
ò timpiri = you hit him
(pás) gís ò timpowari = I made you hit him ???
A gamba form exists for this construction also. For example;-
doikowo = to make (somebody) walk
gasowa has the special meaning "to give birth" and doesn't mean "to create".
.... -ay-
If you split a verb and insert ay between the final vowel of and the rest of the word, you get the meaning that the verb is being attempted. For example ;-
selbaru à = I will drink it
selbayaru à = I will try and drink it
..... Two affixes for Verb => Adjective
LINGUISTIC JARGON ... these two transformations are called "participles". Limbawa has two participles (as has English). The Limbawa and the English participles share the exact same function. In English these 2 participles are usually called "the present participle" and "the past participle" although "active participle" and "passive participle" would be far more appropriate. In Limbawa there is no special name for these 2 transformations.
solbe = to drink
heŋgo = to live (or it could mean "a life")
soŋkau = to die (or it could mean "death")
glabu = person
moʃi = water
moʃi solbi = the drunk water, the water that has been drunk ... an example of the so-called "past participle".
glabu solbana = the drinking person, the person that is drinking, the person that drinks ... an example of the so-called "present participle".
heŋgana = alive, living
soŋki = dead
..... Eight infixes for Noun => Noun
In the above section we learnt how to say "mine", "yours", etc. etc.. But how do we say "my", "your", etc. etc.
Well these words (which would be considered adjectives in the Limbawa linguistic tradition) are represented by infixes. The table below shows how it works.
| my coat | kaunapu |
| our coat ("our" includes "you") | kaunayu |
| our coat ("our excludes "you") | kaunawu |
| your coat | kaunigu |
| your coat (with "you" being plural) | kauneju |
| his/her coat | kaunonu |
| their coat | kaununu |
It can be seen that the infixes are the same as the plain pronouns, but the order of the consonant and vowel are swapped over.
There could also be another entry in the table above. That is the infix -it- (this is the possessive equivalent of the reflexive pronoun ti. (see above). It is probably easiest to explain -it- by way of example;-
polo ?osoru @autito = Paul will drive his car (In English we would normally interpret this to mean "Paul will drive his own car". In Limbawa polo ?osoru @autito must ALWAYS be interpreted as such.
polo ?osoru @autono = Paul will drive his car (In English, this COULD be interpreted as "Paul will drive someone else's car". In Limbawa polo ?osoru @autono would always be interpreted as such.
.....Two prefixes for Noun => Noun
genhu = house
ju.genhu = a mansion
ti.genhu = a cottage
Please note that I am just inserting the period, to make it easy to see the two components of the word. It is a single multi-syllable word, so of course is in the neutral tone.
..... Getting the opposite by adding "u"
.... A prefix for adjectives
taitau = many
utaitau = few
mutu = important
umutu = unimportant
.... and a prefix for adverb
toke = exactly
utoke = approximately
nan = for a long time
unan = not for a long time
unanu => momentarily ... (maybe derived from unan unan originally)
.... and a prefix for nouns
mezna = to fight
meznana = combatant
umeznana = non-combatant
As in English, not found that often. Sometimes found in rule books.
.... but an infix for verbs
There is a reason why we do not simply prefix u to the verbs also.
kanja = to fold
kunjana = "folding" (an adjective) or "one that folds" (a noun)
ukunjana = "one that doesn't fold"
Suppose we did simply prefix u to the verb. Then "to unfold" would be ukanja, and hence ukanjana would be a noun meaning "one that unfolds". But if you look up a bit, you can see that this form (ukanjana) already has the meaning "one that doesn't fold". This would cause confusion.
| kunja | to fold | kunjua | to unfold |
| laiba | to cover | laibua | to uncover |
| fuŋga | to fasten, to lock | fuŋgua | to unfasten, to unlock |
| benda | to assemble, to put together | bendua | to take apart, to disassemble |
| pauca | to stop up, to block | paucua | to unstop |
| sensa | to weave | sensua | to unravel |
| fiŋka | to put on clothes, to dress | fiŋkua | to undress |
| tasta | to tangle | tastua | to untangle |
Note that in any other form but the gamba, the u changes to a w. For example ;-
fiŋkwori = he undressed