Ancient Figo syntax

From FrathWiki
Revision as of 02:08, 11 May 2025 by Bukkia (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Main article: Ancient Figo

This page gives an extensive description of ancient Figo syntactical features.

Main clause and word order

Ancient Figo is an almost strictly SOV (Subject-Object-Verb) language.

līruli soba līločeš 
the man sees the dog

The quite rich case system allows every other possible word order, but most of them prove to be very marked and infrequently used. The only word order with a clear role and a frequent usage is OSV (Object-Subject-Verbs), which marks the so-called passive construction.

soba līruli līločeš
the dog is seen by the man

The other elements in the sentence are usually placed in the order “place-manner-cause-time”, although they are basically freer than the main elements. An object in the dative case, when conveying the indirect object, tends to be placed before the direct object of the sentence.

A peculiar feature is the verbal infinitival agreement: when infinitival forms, as nominal forms of the verbs, take a direct object, are regarded as an expression of belonging, and the direct object is declined in the genitive case.

sobaɕu līločem īsow
I do not see the dog.

The frequency of this feature, however, is already declining in the classical period, when the infinitival forms are used in a verbal costruction (as, for example, with modal verbs). The infinitival agreement is still widely used up to the later classical period when these forms are used in a nominal construction.

Moreover, as it can been seen in the example above, when an infinitival form is governed by a modal verb or by the negative verb īsem, the infinitive is always placed before the conjugated modal form.

Nouns

The noun cluster is formed by a noun, carrying the main meaning, and by other noun-type forms, namely adjectives, which specify this meaning or add other meanings to the main noun. Inside of a noun cluster, the noun can be replaced by a pronoun.

The noun usually closes the noun cluster, being preceded by every other specifying form. Thus, other elements conveying possession and belonging are always placed before the noun, as well as every attributive adjective.

līruɕu sōnu
the man’s house
oltuɕu lilā
my hand
jōbā ōna 
the young woman

The role of the noun cluster in the sentence and its number are marked by case and number endings. These endings mark also other adjectival elements inside the noun cluster, resulting this in the process called nominal agreement.

Both attributive and predicative adjectives agree in case and number with the noun they specify. Other elements, which convey possession or belonging do not agree with the main nominal form.

jōbāli līruli sōnohe imēheš
the young man is going home
oltuɕunu sōnu
our house
jōbāj ōnaj
the two young women
ōnanu jōbānu ɛnešon
the women are young

The agreement among nouns and adjectives is not a universal phenomenon. Indefinite adjectives, indeed, usually do not agree with the nominal form, neither in case nor in number.

The grammar role of noun clusters can be further specified by postpositions, which are placed after the cluster. Thus, it can be stated that the noun cluster can be closed by a postposition.

sōnuhe ūm imēhow
I am going inside the house

The cases

The grammatical role of the noun cluster in a sentence is conveyed by some endings. These endings are bound to grammatical cases, with usually well-defined roles.

The cases in ancient Figo language are 7:

  • Agentive
  • Passive
  • Genitive
  • Dative
  • Causative
  • Instrumental
  • Locative

The grammatical roles and all possible differences in usage among similar cases are enlisted below: